Version history
Publication and withdrawal dates by guideline.
Index
Reference historical guidance versions for audit, governance, and medico-legal review.
Publication and withdrawal dates by guideline.
Why versions matter in governance and claims.
Link version history to audit standards.
A Guideline Version Index is a systematic record that tracks the publication, amendment, and withdrawal history of clinical guidelines. It serves as a centralised reference point for healthcare organisations to verify which version of a guideline was in effect at any given point in time. This is critical for maintaining an audit trail of clinical decision-making and ensuring compliance with the standards of care applicable during a specific period.
In the UK, bodies like the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), and royal colleges periodically update their recommendations based on new evidence. Each update creates a new version, and the index meticulously logs the timeline of these changes.
Maintaining an accurate version history is not an administrative formality; it is a cornerstone of clinical governance and risk management. Its importance is multifaceted:
This index is designed for use by a range of healthcare professionals, including clinical governance leads, risk managers, medical directors, and legal teams. It functions as a lookup tool to establish factual timelines.
Follow this checklist to ensure you are using guideline version information correctly for governance, audit, or legal purposes:
The data within this index is sourced directly from official publications by UK health bodies. The primary sources include:
While this index aggregates and organises this information for convenience, users are always advised to refer to the original source documentation from the publishing authority for the definitive version of any guideline, particularly in a legal context.
Understanding when to consult the version index is crucial for proactive risk management. Typical scenarios include:
For optimal safety and efficiency, version control should be embedded within clinical systems and workflows. Best practices include:
By systematising version control, healthcare organisations move from reactive checking to proactive assurance, significantly reducing clinical risk.
While invaluable, users of the Guideline Versions Index should be aware of its limitations and the broader context of clinical decision-making: