NICE vs RCPsych: Management of Personality Disorders (2025)

This guideline provides a comparative analysis for UK clinicians on the management of Personality Disorders (PD), contrasting the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines with the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) position statements and College Reports as of 2025. While NICE provides a formal, evidence-synthesised guideline (NGNG88, last updated 2022), the RCPsych offers practical, clinically-focused advice that often addresses nuances and complexities beyond the strict evidence base. Understanding both is crucial for holistic, patient-centred care within the NHS and other UK settings.

See how this translates to practice: Explore our Clinical governance features, visit the Patient Safety Hub, or review Clinical Safety & Assurance for enterprise rollout.

Diagnosis and Assessment

NICE Approach

NICE adopts a structured, categorical approach, primarily aligned with ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria. It emphasises the importance of a comprehensive assessment conducted by a healthcare professional competent in diagnosing PDs. The guideline advises considering the diagnosis after a minimum of two assessments and stresses the need to assess for co-existing conditions, such as depression, anxiety, and substance misuse, which are common. NICE is cautious, highlighting that diagnosis should be used to guide treatment and access services, not to stigmatise.

RCPsych Approach

The RCPsych, while acknowledging categorical systems, places a stronger emphasis on a dimensional and formulation-based understanding. It advocates for seeing personality difficulties on a spectrum of severity and focusing on individual personality functioning (e.g., sense of self, interpersonal relationships) rather than just ticking diagnostic criteria boxes. The College strongly promotes the creation of a collaborative, shared formulation with the patient that explains their difficulties in the context of their life experiences. This is seen as more therapeutically useful and less stigmatising than a diagnostic label alone.

Key Difference

NICE is diagnosis-led, providing a standardised framework for identification. RCPsych is formulation-led, focusing on the individual's narrative and the meaning behind their symptoms. In practice, clinicians should integrate both: using a NICE-conformant diagnostic process to ensure consistency, while employing the RCPsych's formulation model to guide personalised treatment.

Treatment Recommendations

Psychological Therapies

• NICE: Recommends specific therapies for specific disorders based on the strongest evidence. For Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), it recommends Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) or Mentalisation-Based Therapy (MBT) as first-line treatments. For Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD), it suggests Cognitive Analytic Therapy (CAT) or DBT. NICE is explicit about what should be offered but has a narrower focus due to its strict evidence-based methodology.
• RCPsych: Supports the NICE-recommended therapies but presents a broader, more flexible menu of options. It acknowledges that the therapeutic relationship and the clinician's skill are as important as the specific modality. The College emphasises the value of structured clinical management (SCM) and other approaches that may be more readily available in the NHS. It strongly advocates for long-term, consistent care rather than short-term interventions.

Pharmacological Interventions

• NICE: Is very clear that medication should not be used solely to treat personality disorder itself. It can be considered for short-term management of acute symptoms like anxiety, agitation, or co-morbid depression, but should be reviewed regularly and discontinued when no longer needed. It cautions strongly against polypharmacy.
• RCPsych: Aligns with this cautious stance but provides more practical guidance on managing complex medication regimes that patients may already be on. It offers advice on safe prescribing in crisis situations and managing expectations with patients who may believe medication is a primary solution.

Key Difference

NICE defines the "gold-standard" therapy based on RCT evidence. RCPsych provides a pragmatic framework for delivering effective care within real-world constraints, emphasising the common factors of good clinical care over rigid adherence to a single model.

Special Situations and Comorbidities

Co-existing Conditions

Both guidelines stress the high prevalence of comorbidities. NICE addresses this by recommending treating the most severe condition first, which is often the PD, as it can undermine treatment for other disorders. RCPsych provides more detailed advice on managing the interplay between PD and conditions like eating disorders or complex PTSD, often advocating for integrated rather than sequential treatment.

Crisis and Risk Management

• NICE: Advises against the use of crisis cards alone and emphasises the importance of developing a jointly agreed crisis plan that includes self-management strategies and clear contact points. It discourages hospital admission for medium-term management unless absolutely necessary.
• RCPsych: Offers extensive guidance on risk management, particularly around self-harm and suicidality. It promotes a team-based approach (e.g., using a Care Programme Approach - CPA) to share the emotional burden and maintain a consistent strategy. It provides practical tools for assessing risk in context.

Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD)

This is a key area of divergence. NICE has a dedicated guideline for ASPD, recommending psychological interventions within a structured care plan. RCPsych publications offer more nuanced advice on engaging individuals with ASPD, often focusing on the challenges of therapeutic engagement and the management of risk within forensic and general settings.

Practical Clinical Flow: A Synthesis

Combining the strengths of both guidelines, a practical flow for UK clinicians would be:

1. Presentation & Engagement: Build a trusting relationship. Focus on the patient's priorities (e.g., sleep, anxiety) rather than leading with a PD assessment.
2. Assessment: Conduct a NICE-aligned assessment for PD and comorbidities. Simultaneously, begin a RCPsych-style collaborative formulation to understand the person's story.
3. Discussion & Planning: Share the diagnosis/formulation sensitively. Co-create a crisis and treatment plan (CPA if severe) involving the patient and, with consent, their family/carers.
4. Treatment: Offer NICE-recommended therapy if available and appropriate. If not, provide structured, consistent, and psychologically-informed clinical management as advocated by RCPsych. Use medication cautiously for co-morbid symptoms only.
5. Long-term Management: Personality disorders require long-term care. Focus on maintaining a consistent therapeutic relationship, reviewing the formulation, and supporting social functioning, as per RCPsych's emphasis on continuity.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for Clinicians

1. Which guideline should I follow if they conflict?

Direct conflicts are rare. NICE represents the formal, evidence-based standard for the NHS. RCPsych guidance is intended to complement NICE by adding clinical wisdom and pragmatism. In cases of uncertainty, the NICE guideline should be considered the primary source, but the RCPsych advice can help with its implementation. Your local trust policy may also provide specific directives.

2. How do I manage a patient in crisis who doesn't engage with a crisis plan?

Both guidelines warn against punitive responses. RCPsych guidance is particularly strong here: maintain a calm, validating stance. Revisit the plan when the patient is calmer. Focus on what they feel would help in that moment, even if it's just listening. Avoid ascribing the crisis to "personality disorder" in a pejorative way; instead, frame it as a skill deficit or understandable response to stress.

3. What is the role of the GP in ongoing management?

GPs are crucial for continuity and physical health. NICE highlights the need for clear communication between secondary care and primary care. RCPsych explicitly advises GPs to provide consistent, non-rejecting care, managing repeat prescriptions cautiously and acting as a stable point of contact, even when the patient is with secondary services.

4. How should teams manage "counter-transference" or strong negative feelings towards a patient?

This is a core strength of the RCPsych guidance. It normalises these feelings and recommends robust, non-blaming clinical supervision and team reflection to prevent negative reactions from influencing care. NICE mentions the need for supervision but RCPsych provides the detailed framework for it.

5. Are there specific considerations for young people?

Yes. Both guidelines caution against diagnosing PD in under-18s, but stress that emerging traits should be taken seriously. NICE recommends seeking specialist opinion. RCPsych provides more detail on working with families and using developmental frameworks to understand these difficulties without applying a potentially stigmatising label prematurely.

Source Links

• NICE Guideline NG88: Personality disorders: recognition and management (Last updated September 2022) - NICE NG88
• RCPsych College Report CR211: Personality Disorders: A Guide for Primary Care (2021) - RCPsych guidance
• RCPsych Position Statement: PS04/18 Services for People with Personality Disorder (2018) - RCPsych guidance