Recommendation diffs
Track exactly what changed, not just the guideline title.
Guideline Updates
Recommendation-level diffs, timestamps, and reviewer notes that keep teams current.
Guideline Updates is a specialised module within the CliniSearch platform that automatically tracks and documents changes to clinical guidelines at the individual recommendation level. It provides a comprehensive audit trail of modifications, including what was changed, when it changed, and the clinical significance of each update. This system transforms guideline management from a manual, document-based process into an automated, searchable database of clinical evidence evolution.
This tool is designed for clinical governance teams, patient safety officers, clinical leads, and healthcare professionals who need to maintain current practice according to the latest evidence. It's particularly valuable for NHS trusts, integrated care systems, and private healthcare providers who need to demonstrate compliance with national guidelines and maintain robust clinical governance frameworks.
The module specifically addresses the challenge of "silent guideline drift," where minor but clinically significant changes go unnoticed between major guideline revisions. By tracking individual recommendation modifications, it ensures that even subtle changes to dosing thresholds, diagnostic criteria, or treatment sequencing are captured and brought to clinical attention.
The system operates through a structured process that begins with comprehensive inputs from authoritative sources. CliniSearch continuously monitors and ingests guidelines from NICE, SIGN, Royal Colleges, and other UK national bodies, alongside local trust policies and protocols that organisations choose to integrate. Each guideline undergoes detailed parsing to extract individual recommendations, dosing information, diagnostic criteria, and treatment pathways.
Processing involves sophisticated indexing and versioning technology that creates a granular digital representation of each guideline. When updates occur, the system performs differential analysis at the recommendation level, identifying additions, deletions, and modifications. This includes changes to clinical thresholds, medication dosages, diagnostic criteria, and procedural recommendations. Each change is timestamped, categorized by clinical impact severity, and linked to the source publication.
Outputs include real-time alerts for significant changes, detailed change logs with before-and-after comparisons, and automatically generated audit artefacts for governance meetings. The system produces digest-ready summaries that highlight clinically important modifications, supporting efficient review processes and ensuring that patient care remains aligned with current best practice.
The platform maintains a complete version history for each recommendation, allowing clinicians to understand the evolution of clinical thinking on specific topics. This historical perspective can be valuable for clinical audit, research purposes, and understanding the evidence base behind current recommendations.
The guideline update workflow follows a systematic process that begins with change detection and progresses through review and implementation. When NICE publishes an update to a cancer guideline, CliniSearch automatically identifies that 14 specific recommendations have been modified, including 3 high-impact changes to treatment pathways and 2 moderate-impact adjustments to diagnostic criteria.
The clinical governance team receives an alert categorising changes by severity. They access the platform to view side-by-side comparisons of each modified recommendation, complete with timestamps and source references. The lead oncologist reviews the high-impact changes first, adding notes about local implementation considerations. Meanwhile, the pharmacy team examines dosing adjustments and updates their protocols accordingly.
Within 48 hours of the guideline publication, the trust has documented review of all changes, implemented necessary protocol updates, and generated an audit trail demonstrating compliance. The system automatically produces a summary report for the next clinical governance committee meeting, highlighting key changes and documenting the review process.
For moderate and low-impact changes, the system allows for bulk acknowledgement and assignment of review responsibilities. Clinical teams can filter changes by specialty, impact level, or clinical area to focus their review efforts efficiently. The platform supports collaborative review workflows with multiple stakeholders, ensuring comprehensive coverage of all guideline modifications.
Guideline Updates maintains rigorous provenance tracking by recording the exact source and publication date of every guideline version. The system handles updates through a controlled process that preserves previous versions while highlighting current recommendations. This ensures that clinicians can reference historical context when needed while maintaining focus on current best practice.
Wording controls ensure that guideline text is presented accurately without modification, maintaining the original clinical intent and nuance. The system captures exact phrasing changes, including subtle modifications to conditional language or strength of recommendation that may carry significant clinical implications.
The comprehensive audit trail documents every interaction with guideline updates, including who reviewed each change, when the review occurred, and any notes added during the process. This creates a defensible record for clinical governance, quality assurance, and regulatory compliance purposes, supporting organisations in demonstrating adherence to evidence-based practice.
Safety features include automatic flagging of potentially conflicting recommendations when multiple guidelines cover similar clinical scenarios. The system also identifies changes that might affect existing patient pathways or require service reconfiguration, providing early warning for service planning and risk management purposes.
How quickly can we implement Guideline Updates? Most organisations can begin using the system within 2-4 weeks, depending on integration requirements with existing clinical systems. The platform is designed for gradual implementation, allowing teams to start with high-priority guidelines before expanding coverage.
Does it require IT department involvement? While IT support is helpful for deeper integrations, the web-based platform can be used immediately with minimal technical setup. Clinical and governance teams can typically begin using the core features without significant IT resource allocation.
Can we customise alert thresholds and notification frequencies? Yes, organisations can configure alert settings based on clinical impact levels, specific guidelines, or user roles. Notifications can be tailored to match existing governance workflows and meeting cycles.
Where is our guideline data stored? All data is stored in UK-based data centres compliant with NHS Digital standards and GDPR requirements. Organisations can choose between cloud-based or on-premises deployment options based on their security and governance preferences.
How is local policy information protected? Local policies and protocols are treated as confidential organisational data with appropriate access controls. The system maintains separation between publicly available national guidelines and organisation-specific content.
What happens to historical guideline versions? All previous guideline versions are retained indefinitely unless specifically purged according to organisational retention policies. This ensures complete auditability and supports historical clinical review when needed.
Does it cover all clinical specialties? The system currently covers major UK national guidelines across primary care, hospital medicine, and surgical specialties. Coverage continues to expand based on clinical demand and guideline publication frequency.
Can it integrate with all clinical systems? While CliniSearch offers APIs for integration with electronic patient records and clinical decision support systems, specific integration capabilities depend on the target system's interoperability features. The team works with organisations to identify optimal integration approaches.
How does it handle conflicting guideline recommendations? The system identifies potential conflicts between different guidelines but does not automatically resolve them. Conflicting recommendations are flagged for clinical review, with supporting evidence presented to help clinicians make informed decisions.
Track exactly what changed, not just the guideline title.
Tag changes by clinical impact for prioritised review.
Capture who reviewed the change and when.
Summaries built for governance meetings and safety huddles.
Explore the full update tracking workflow and evidence detail.
Open the detailed brief