Audit Programme Design: A CQC-Ready Framework
This resource provides a comprehensive, evidence-based framework for designing and managing a robust clinical audit programme that meets the standards of the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and integrates National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. It is intended for audit leads, clinical directors, and governance teams to establish a systematic, defensible, and improvement-focused audit cycle.
Core Principles of a CQC and NICE-Aligned Audit Programme
A clinically effective and inspection-ready audit programme is not a collection of ad-hoc projects but a strategically managed system. Its design must be rooted in principles that ensure it drives quality improvement and demonstrates robust governance.
Strategic Alignment with CQC Quality Statements
The CQC's assessment framework, centred around quality statements, provides the overarching structure for demonstrating safe and effective care. Your audit programme must provide tangible evidence against these statements.
CQC Alignment: Key Quality Statements
- Learning, improvement and innovation (Quality Statement 6): The audit programme is the primary vehicle for demonstrating systematic learning and improvement. It must show how findings lead to change.
- Safe and effective staffing (Quality Statement 21): Audits can evidence that staff have the competencies required to deliver care in line with evidence-based guidance.
- Evidence-based care and treatment (Quality Statement 12): This is the core of NICE-aligned auditing, demonstrating that care pathways reflect NG, QS, and other relevant guidance.
- Governance, management, and sustainability (Quality Statement 16): The programme's structure, reporting lines, and oversight mechanisms show effective governance.
Integration of NICE Guidance
NICE guidance provides the benchmark for clinical best practice. Your audit programme should systematically incorporate different types of NICE guidance:
- NICE Guidelines (NG): Broad, evidence-based recommendations on the treatment and care of people with specific diseases and conditions. These are the most common source for audit criteria.
- NICE Quality Standards (QS): Concise, measurable statements designed to drive quality improvement. They are ideal for audit as they are specifically designed to be measurable.
- NICE Technology Appraisals (TA): Recommendations on the use of new and existing medicines and treatments within the NHS. Audits can ensure compliance with TA-directed formularies and pathways.
- NICE Medical Technologies Guidance (MTG): Recommendations on the adoption of medical devices and diagnostics. Audits can assess uptake and correct usage.
Actionable Principle: When designing an audit, always ask: "Which specific NICE recommendation (e.g., NG123, Recommendation 1.4.5) are we testing against?" This creates a direct, defensible link to the evidence base.
Structured Programme Design: Mapping, Prioritisation, and Scheduling
A haphazard approach to audit selection leads to wasted resources and poor CQC assessment. A systematic process for selecting and scheduling audits is critical.
Topic Identification and Mapping
Potential audit topics should be gathered from multiple sources to ensure the programme is comprehensive and responsive.
- Mandatory Audits: National audits (e.g., National Cardiac Audit Programme), and Trust-mandated audits (e.g., VTE risk assessment).
- NICE Guidance Triggers: Schedule an audit for all new or significantly updated NICE Guidelines (NG) and Quality Standards (QS) relevant to your service. This is a proactive measure.
- Clinical Governance Data:
- Incident reports (e.g., frequent medication errors)
- Patient safety alerts
- Patient experience and complaint themes
- Datix trends and serious incident (SI) investigation recommendations
- Service Development: Audits to evaluate new pathways, clinics, or technologies.
Robust Prioritisation Matrix
Not all potential audits can be conducted simultaneously. Use a scoring matrix to objectively prioritise topics. The following table provides a practical template.
Audit Prioritisation Scoring Matrix
| Criterion | High Score (3) | Medium Score (2) | Low Score (1) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient Safety/Risk | Direct link to severe harm/mortality | Link to moderate harm | Link to minor/no harm | |
| CQC/NICE Alignment | Directly tests a CQC Key Line of Enquiry or mandatory NICE QS | Aligns with NICE NG or service priority | Informational or low-priority guidance | |
| Strategic Importance | Core service objective or CNST incentive | Supports service development | Limited strategic impact | |
| Resource/Cost Impact | High-cost area with potential for significant savings | Medium-cost area | Low-cost area | |
| Feasibility | Data easily available, clear methodology | Some data collection required | Complex data collection, high resource need |
How to use: Score each potential audit topic. Topics with the highest total scores are prioritised for the annual programme.
Annual Scheduling and Governance Structure
The audit programme should be an annual schedule approved by the relevant governance committee (e.g., Clinical Effectiveness Group).
Governance Structure Example:
- Audit Lead/Clinical Director: Oversees programme design, resource allocation, and reporting.
- Clinical Effectiveness/Governance Committee: Approves the annual programme, receives exception reports and summary findings, and holds divisions to account for implementing actions.
- Divisional Governance Groups: Monitor progress of individual audits within their division, support action plan development.
- Individual Audit Teams: Responsible for execution, analysis, and initial reporting.
The schedule should be realistic, accounting for clinical pressures, and should stagger audits to avoid peaks in workload.
Documentation Framework: Creating Inspection-Ready Records
Clear, consistent documentation is not bureaucracy; it is the evidence trail for the CQC. It demonstrates a closed-loop audit cycle from planning to re-audit.
The Audit Programme Matrix
This is the master document, typically an Excel spreadsheet or SharePoint list, that provides an overview of the entire programme. It must be kept live and updated.
Essential Columns for the Programme Matrix
| Column Heading | Description and Example |
|---|---|
| Audit ID | Unique reference (e.g., MED-2024-01) |
| Audit Topic | Clear title (e.g., "Adherence to NICE NG215 [Venous thromboembolism] in adult inpatients") |
| Lead Clinician | Name and role |
| Primary NICE Reference | e.g., NG215, QS201 |
| CQC Quality Statement | e.g., QS12: Evidence-based care and treatment |
| Sample Size & Method | e.g., "Retrospective, 30 case notes" |
| Baseline Audit Date | Date of first data collection |
| Status | e.g., Planning, Data Collection, Analysis, Awaiting Action Plan, Complete, Re-audit Scheduled |
| Key Finding & Compliance % | Brief summary of outcome |
| Action Plan Lead & Date | Who is responsible for implementing changes and by when |
| Re-audit Date | Scheduled date for closing the loop |
Standardised Audit Protocol Template
Every audit must have a pre-approved protocol. This ensures methodological rigour and consistency. Below is a practical template.
Clinical Audit Protocol Template
1. Title: [Clear, descriptive title]
2. Rationale: [Why is this audit important? Reference specific NICE guidance, incident data, or service need].
3. Aim/Objective: [What specific process or outcome are you measuring?].
4. Standards/Criteria:
- Standard 1: [Direct quote from NICE NGXXX, Recommendation X.X] - Target: 100%
- Standard 2: [Direct quote from NICE NGXXX, Recommendation X.X] - Target: 95%
5. Methodology:
- Design: [Retrospective case note review, prospective observation, etc.]
- Population/Sample: [Inclusion/exclusion criteria, sample size calculation if applicable]
- Data Collection: [Tool e.g., data collection form, electronic system]
6. Ethics & Governance: [Confirmation of registration with Trust audit department, data confidentiality measures].
7. Project Plan: [Timeline with milestones for data collection, analysis, report writing, and presentation].
8. Dissemination & Action Plan: [Where will results be presented? How will an action plan be developed?].
The Audit Cycle: Review, Adaptation, and Response to Change
An audit programme is a dynamic entity. A static programme will quickly become obsolete. Building in regular review and adaptation mechanisms is essential for maintaining its relevance and effectiveness.
Regular Programme Review Cycle
The entire programme should be reviewed at least quarterly by the governance committee, focusing on:
- Progress against schedule: Identifying audits that are delayed and understanding the reasons (e.g., resource constraints, data issues).
- Review of completed audits: Scrutinising the quality of action plans and their implementation.
- Emerging risks and new guidance: Assessing whether new patient safety alerts or published NICE guidance necessitate a change in priorities.
Responding to NICE Guidance Updates
A proactive system for monitoring NICE updates is a hallmark of a well-governed programme.
Process for Integrating New NICE Guidance
- Alert: Designate a person (e.g., Clinical Librarian, Audit Lead) to monitor NICE publications via email alerts or the NICE website.
- Filter: Upon publication of a new NG or QS, quickly assess its relevance to your services.
- Prioritise: If relevant, use the prioritisation matrix to score the need for an audit. A new QS on a high-risk topic will likely score highly.
- Integrate: Slot the new audit into the programme, which may require de-prioritising a less critical audit. Document the reason for the change.
- Communicate: Inform the relevant clinical teams and governance groups of the new audit and its rationale.
Closing the Loop: The Re-audit Imperative
An audit without a re-audit is merely a data collection exercise. The CQC requires evidence that findings have led to improvement.
Actionable Guidance for Re-auditing:
- SMART Action Plans: The initial audit must produce a Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound action plan. The re-audit then tests the effectiveness of these actions.
- Timing: Re-audit should occur after sufficient time for actions to be embedded (typically 6-12 months).
- Focus: The re-audit can be a focused check on the specific criteria that showed poor compliance in the baseline audit, rather than a full repeat.
- Example: Baseline audit of NG149 (Stroke) shows 60% compliance with swallow screening within 4 hours of admission. Action: Mandatory training for all junior doctors on the screening tool. Re-audit 9 months later shows 95% compliance, demonstrating effective improvement.
Supporting Clinicians at Different Stages
The programme must be accessible and manageable for all staff involved.
- For New Audit Leads: Provide a starter pack including this framework, the protocol template, and a named mentor. Offer training on data analysis and report writing.
- For Experienced Consultants: Focus on strategic leadership—helping them mentor juniors, and ensuring their audits are strategically aligned and well-documented.
- For Junior Doctors in Training: Link audit topics directly to their curriculum requirements. Provide clear, simple templates and protected time to complete the audit cycle, emphasising the importance of the action plan and re-audit, not just data collection.
Conclusion
A well-designed clinical audit programme is a cornerstone of clinical governance and a critical asset during CQC inspection. By adopting this framework—rooted in strategic alignment with CQC and NICE, systematic prioritisation, robust documentation, and a dynamic review cycle—you will create a programme that is not only inspection-ready but, more importantly, genuinely effective in driving continuous improvement in patient care and safety.
Need help with Audit Programme Design?
We can help integrate these governance resources into your Trust or training programme.